Thursday, September 6
Alsumaria News / Baghdad
A member of the stream of wisdom within the bloc of reform and reconstruction Hassan Masoudi, on Thursday, that the decision of the Federal Court in 2010 on the interpretation of the largest bloc was “clear and accurate and does not need interpretations,” while pointing to the need to amend the law parties to include the issue of the commitment of the winning MP to stay on the list pending Alliances are settled.
Masoudi said in an interview for Alsumaria News, “The decision of the Federal Court in 2010 on the interpretation of the largest bloc was clear and accurate and does not need interpretations, as indicated that the largest bloc form of winning lists and not the winners,” noting that “the moral and political commitment indicates that MPs did not raise their votes, but the votes of their lists and most often emphasizes the need for the survival of the MP in the list, which rose through them until the resolution of alliances.
“This matter is important and we would like to be included in the parties law, but we believe there is a need to amend the law during this session to correct this important and moral part,” Masoudi said. “Any inquiry sent to the Federal Court on the largest bloc should Be through the president-elect because the head of the age-specific powers certain things. “
The building block, which includes the rule of law and Fatah and a number of political forces, and the bloc of reform and reconstruction, which includes wisdom, patriotism, decision and victory, announced on Monday (3 September 2018), in the first session of the House of Representatives in its fourth session that each of them is the largest bloc after the submission of two signature papers To the head of the age.